Sometimes the most powerful case studies fall into the “what NOT to do” category. Take, for instance, a new branding initiative from the Australian Ministry of Tourism.
It’s a big deal down under.
This isn’t some neighborhood non-proft looking for a new logo for their newsletter. This is a multi-national marketing effort for a nation of 21 million people that consistently ranks as one of the world’s most popular nation-brands.
They’re going to spend 20 million dollars next year promoting their new brand to the rest of the world. And they’re launching the effort with a logo contest. Grand prize: $2500.
What’s wrong with that picture? How much great branding work do you suppose they’ll get in exchange for a slim chance at $2500?
The problem with contests is they attract the youngest, hungriest designers with the skinniest portfolios around. Serious pros won’t touch it because it’s not enough money and the odds of success are too slim.
The Austrailian government received 362 entries and have now culled the uruly collection down to only 200 or so. (to see some entries click here: )
But I’m not even going to address the subjective, artistic side of this. (I think the samples say it all.) Instead, let’s look at the steps in the branding process that are always ignored in a contest environment. Like brand strategy and a clearly defined creative brief.
Here’s what the brief says for the Australian assignment:
“Designers and contest participants should submit ideas for a contemporary Australia brand that captures the essence of the nation and presents Australia as a great place for living, holidaying, education, business, manufacturing, agriculture and investment. Submissions should articulate as clearly as possible Australia’s brand position in the context of the global marketplace and help the Government capture “the vibrancy, energy and creative talents of Australia”.
What brand position? How can they possibly “capture the essence of a nation” when there’s nothing on the website or on any links that even hints at a brand strategy document? The young art school grads are left to figure out the strategy on their own…
“Designers and contest participants may choose to spend time researching Australia and its current brand.”
“May choose to??? Any good branding firm would insist on it.
Research is the foundation of any truly professional branding effort. But the graphic designers who enter contests are not the people doing the research and the strategic thinking. It’s not in their DNA. They’re involved later in the artistic, execution phase. But if you skip the strategic piece, the designers have no direction. They’re just throwing darts, hoping something will stick.
Taglines are always a good reflection of the strategy. If the lines are random, like the list below, the strategy is clearly missing.
Australia “The heart of many nations.”
Australia “Lighting up the world.”
Australia “Make it real.”
Australia “Live it up down under.”
Australia “It’s real noice.”
Australia “The inside story”
Australia “It all happens here.”
Which is it? Without a thorough brand strategy document it’s virtually impossible to judge the 362 taglines in any objective way.
And here’s where it gets really messed up. The public gets to vote! With no strategy, no experience and no information whatsoever, the average Joe gets a say in the branding of a nation.
I’ve often seen the results of these contests fail completely. The client pays the prize money but ends up with nothing useable. Then it’s back to the drawing board with a firm that actually knows what they’re doing.
Developing a brand strategy is not easy. It takes discipline, creativity and thorough research. But it’s a required element for success. Contest or no contest.
Tiny URL for this post: