<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter me this… how do you define “guru” in social media marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/</link>
	<description>Tagline about this blog ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Natty</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Natty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=322#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Great Post. Can you email me back, please. Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post. Can you email me back, please. Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cozea</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cozea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=322#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Based on the etymology of the word &#039;guru&quot;, the locution &quot;self help gurus&quot; has a distancing and somewhat critical connotation. I believe we all had one or two gurus in our formative years and only later in life we (some of us) tend to become more critical of those who think they know best what is good for us or for the survival of humankind. I still respect (the notion) that some of us are more expert at something than others (the natural or socially-engineered division of work is perhaps the main factor), but when I see the mental prosternation of people vis-a-vis gurus like Anthony Robbins I simply cringe. Personally, I was lucky to experience such awakenings about the roles these gurus play in our life and how phony they could be. One example is (Dr) Andrew Weil when, during a televised conference, (he)explained how toxic celery sticks are. I didn&#039;t touch celery sticks for a couple of years after that and one day, cornered by politeness, I had to munch on the only snack a graceful hostess put under my nose. I felt like Gustave Mahler must have felt when he was offered pork to eat at a party in his honour. I don&#039;t say that (Dr) Weil is an idiot; on the contrary, I am grateful to him for opening my eyes and helping me with discerning amongst true experts and self-titled experts.
The net and the web 2.0 have produced a plethora of self-proclaimed gurus and, unfortunately, because we are highly developed social &amp; societal beings, we tend to choose a leader of sorts from amongst us. Yes, I agree with Chris Locke that the deafening noise of social media (marketing) is preferable to the old methods of all kinds of indoctrination. And John, the fact that we chit-chat freely about that shows that we still have the capacity to discern, criticize and ridicule the resellers of old get-rich-quick or become-an-expert-in-five-minutes hucksters --- the latest kind of nouveau riche riding on the waves of social media. Their crass lack of modesty and (intellectual &amp; moral) decency is another manifestation of the homo homini lupus world we still live in after 10,000 years of human...evolution.
Yes, Jamie is right in his first paragraph, but then who could enforce  the &quot;simple rule&quot;? Yes, we could ignore the so-called gurus, but they are becoming better and better at marketing themselves. We all look pretty much alike and the differences appear and become evident mostly when we open our mouth and prove who we really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the etymology of the word &#8216;guru&#8221;, the locution &#8220;self help gurus&#8221; has a distancing and somewhat critical connotation. I believe we all had one or two gurus in our formative years and only later in life we (some of us) tend to become more critical of those who think they know best what is good for us or for the survival of humankind. I still respect (the notion) that some of us are more expert at something than others (the natural or socially-engineered division of work is perhaps the main factor), but when I see the mental prosternation of people vis-a-vis gurus like Anthony Robbins I simply cringe. Personally, I was lucky to experience such awakenings about the roles these gurus play in our life and how phony they could be. One example is (Dr) Andrew Weil when, during a televised conference, (he)explained how toxic celery sticks are. I didn&#8217;t touch celery sticks for a couple of years after that and one day, cornered by politeness, I had to munch on the only snack a graceful hostess put under my nose. I felt like Gustave Mahler must have felt when he was offered pork to eat at a party in his honour. I don&#8217;t say that (Dr) Weil is an idiot; on the contrary, I am grateful to him for opening my eyes and helping me with discerning amongst true experts and self-titled experts.<br />
The net and the web 2.0 have produced a plethora of self-proclaimed gurus and, unfortunately, because we are highly developed social &amp; societal beings, we tend to choose a leader of sorts from amongst us. Yes, I agree with Chris Locke that the deafening noise of social media (marketing) is preferable to the old methods of all kinds of indoctrination. And John, the fact that we chit-chat freely about that shows that we still have the capacity to discern, criticize and ridicule the resellers of old get-rich-quick or become-an-expert-in-five-minutes hucksters &#8212; the latest kind of nouveau riche riding on the waves of social media. Their crass lack of modesty and (intellectual &amp; moral) decency is another manifestation of the homo homini lupus world we still live in after 10,000 years of human&#8230;evolution.<br />
Yes, Jamie is right in his first paragraph, but then who could enforce  the &#8220;simple rule&#8221;? Yes, we could ignore the so-called gurus, but they are becoming better and better at marketing themselves. We all look pretty much alike and the differences appear and become evident mostly when we open our mouth and prove who we really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Riddell</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Riddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=322#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Those self help &#039;gurus&#039; have always been around, whether it was in the small ads or stickers on a lampost. The Internet indeed has given them a potentially bigger voice and a quicker reach but the problem is not new.

I guess a simple rule should be, if you call yourself an expert, guru or such you should be ignored. It is for others to define someone as an expert or guru for it to really mean something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those self help &#8216;gurus&#8217; have always been around, whether it was in the small ads or stickers on a lampost. The Internet indeed has given them a potentially bigger voice and a quicker reach but the problem is not new.</p>
<p>I guess a simple rule should be, if you call yourself an expert, guru or such you should be ignored. It is for others to define someone as an expert or guru for it to really mean something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/11/09/twitter-me-this%e2%80%a6-how-do-you-define-%e2%80%9cguru%e2%80%9d-in-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=322#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Deafening as it is, I&#039;m happy to trade the new noise for the end of military, corporate, and yes, even editorial control. Funny you should mention the self-help hucksters, that&#039;s been a good part of my beat since Gonzo Marketing, my little known book that followed on the heels of Cluetrain.

http://mysticbourgeoisie.blogspot.com

btw, the &quot;third-rate actor in a 4th rate play&quot; line was David Weinberger&#039;s, if memory serves. Cluetrain had two other authors as well: Doc Searls and Rick Levine.

Thanks for pressing WordPress into service to blog on this ever-bloggable theme, Rockstar. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deafening as it is, I&#8217;m happy to trade the new noise for the end of military, corporate, and yes, even editorial control. Funny you should mention the self-help hucksters, that&#8217;s been a good part of my beat since Gonzo Marketing, my little known book that followed on the heels of Cluetrain.</p>
<p><a href="http://mysticbourgeoisie.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://mysticbourgeoisie.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>btw, the &#8220;third-rate actor in a 4th rate play&#8221; line was David Weinberger&#8217;s, if memory serves. Cluetrain had two other authors as well: Doc Searls and Rick Levine.</p>
<p>Thanks for pressing WordPress into service to blog on this ever-bloggable theme, Rockstar. <img src='http://www.brandinsightblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
