<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands that are built to last.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/04/17/brands-that-are-built-to-last/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/04/17/brands-that-are-built-to-last/</link>
	<description>Tagline about this blog ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/04/17/brands-that-are-built-to-last/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=185#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Great post! However, just like the above comment, I think that perhaps Hilfiger was trying to reinvent themselves and shift their brand to changing trend, and stay on top of it. I&#039;m curious to know how to draw the line between the core and the trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! However, just like the above comment, I think that perhaps Hilfiger was trying to reinvent themselves and shift their brand to changing trend, and stay on top of it. I&#8217;m curious to know how to draw the line between the core and the trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onbrands</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/04/17/brands-that-are-built-to-last/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>onbrands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=185#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Mike, I&#039;m curious on that point as well. I can&#039;t think of any examples... though we could certainly point to brands that have revived themselves (Apple, Harley Davidson, Cadillac)... I&#039;m not sure reinvention is the right term though.

John, good post. I agree that great brands are built on one core idea, one you&#039;re able to deliver upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I&#8217;m curious on that point as well. I can&#8217;t think of any examples&#8230; though we could certainly point to brands that have revived themselves (Apple, Harley Davidson, Cadillac)&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure reinvention is the right term though.</p>
<p>John, good post. I agree that great brands are built on one core idea, one you&#8217;re able to deliver upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Frizzi</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinsightblog.com/2009/04/17/brands-that-are-built-to-last/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Frizzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=185#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Good post. Lately I have seen more and more brands move away from their established and successful positions. The Hilfiger example is an old one, but it is no less relevant. I wonder how many companies have had successful reinventions of their respective brands? None spring to mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Lately I have seen more and more brands move away from their established and successful positions. The Hilfiger example is an old one, but it is no less relevant. I wonder how many companies have had successful reinventions of their respective brands? None spring to mind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

